Showing posts with label interval training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interval training. Show all posts

Friday, June 26, 2009

Can you get fit in 6 minutes a week?

NY TIMES, June 24

By Gretchen Reynolds

A few years ago, researchers at the National Institute of Health and Nutrition in Japan put rats through a series of swim tests with surprising results. They had one group of rodents paddle in a small pool for six hours, this long workout broken into two sessions of three hours each. A second group of rats were made to stroke furiously through short, intense bouts of swimming, while carrying ballast to increase their workload. After 20 seconds, the weighted rats were scooped out of the water and allowed to rest for 10 seconds, before being placed back in the pool for another 20 seconds of exertion. The scientists had the rats repeat these brief, strenuous swims 14 times, for a total of about four-and-a-half minutes of swimming. Afterward, the researchers tested each rat’s muscle fibers and found that, as expected, the rats that had gone for the six-hour swim showed preliminary molecular changes that would increase endurance. But the second rodent group, which exercised for less than five minutes also showed the same molecular changes.

The potency of interval training is nothing new. Many athletes have been straining through interval sessions once or twice a week along with their regular workout for years. But what researchers have been looking at recently is whether humans, like that second group of rats, can increase endurance with only a few minutes of strenuous exercise, instead of hours? Could it be that most of us are spending more time than we need to trying to get fit?

The answer, a growing number of these sports scientists believe, may be yes.

“There was a time when the scientific literature suggested that the only way to achieve endurance was through endurance-type activities,” such as long runs or bike rides or, perhaps, six-hour swims, says Martin Gibala, PhD, chairman of the Department of Kinesiology at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada. But ongoing research from Gibala’s lab is turning that idea on its head. In one of the group’s recent studies, Gibala and his colleagues had a group of college students, who were healthy but not athletes, ride a stationary bike at a sustainable pace for between 90 and 120 minutes. Another set of students grunted through a series of short, strenuous intervals: 20 to 30 seconds of cycling at the highest intensity the riders could stand. After resting for four minutes, the students pedaled hard again for another 20 to 30 seconds, repeating the cycle four to six times (depending on how much each person could stand), “for a total of two to three minutes of very intense exercise per training session,” Gibala says.

Each of the two groups exercised three times a week. After two weeks, both groups showed almost identical increases in their endurance (as measured in a stationary bicycle time trial), even
though the one group had exercised for six to nine minutes per week, and the other about five hours. Additionally, molecular changes that signal increased fitness were evident equally in both groups. “The number and size of the mitochondria within the muscles” of the students had increased significantly, Gibala says, a change that, before this work, had been associated almost exclusively with prolonged endurance training. Since mitochondria enable muscle cells to use oxygen to create energy, “changes in the volume of the mitochondria can have a big impact on endurance performance.” In other words, six minutes or so a week of hard exercise (plus the time spent warming up, cooling down, and resting between the bouts of intense work) had proven to be as good as multiple hours of working out for achieving fitness. The short, intense workouts aided in weight loss, too, although Gibala hadn’t been studying that effect. “The rate of energy expenditure remains higher longer into recovery” after brief, high-intensity exercise than after longer, easier workouts, Gibala says. Other researchers have found that similar, intense, brief sessions of exercise improve cardiac health, even among people with heart disease.

There’s a catch, though. Those six minutes, if they’re to be effective, must hurt. “We describe it as an ‘all-out’ effort,” Gibala says. You’ll be straying “well out of your comfort zone.” That level of discomfort makes some activities better-suited to intense training than others. “We haven’t studied runners,” Gibala says. The pounding involved in repeated sprinting could lead to injuries, depending on a runner’s experience and stride mechanics. But cycling and swimming work well. “I’m a terrible swimmer,” Gibala says, “so every session for me is intense, just because my technique is so awful.”

Meanwhile, his lab is studying whether people could telescope their workouts into even less time. Could a single, two- to three-minute bout of intense exercise confer the same endurance and health benefits as those six minutes of multiple intervals? Gibala is hopeful. “I’m 41, with two young children,” he says. “I don’t have time to go out and exercise for hours.” The results should be available this fall.

For more information on interval training, go to Turbulence Training.com

In good health,


Rachel and Linda
http://losefatlivehealthy.com/

Saturday, June 6, 2009

20 minute fat burning workout!

Good morning.

I just got back from a great kick a@@ workout and I wanted to share it with you. I have to admit, yesterday my eating was not so good. It was a rainy, gloomy day and I was home all day....which is not good for my diet! I didn't eat terrible, just too much because I was around all day. The key for me is to get out, so the food is not always in my face. The bottom line is, healthy food has calories too.

So, that being said, I decided I needed to get out and work this morning! I was going to go for my typical 3 1/2 mile run, just to get out and get moving. However, once I got out, I changed my mind.

We have this awesome hill in town, which for most, is challenging to just walk up. It's is perfect for me because it's about 3 minute slow run from my house--the perfect warm up. That's what I did. Ran to the hill deciding on my way there what kind of workout I was going to do.

The workout kind of just happened for me and this is what I did:

Workout:

warm up 3 min jog
Hill sprint 25 secs
walk down 30 secs

*Repeat for a total of 8 sprints

That is usually my workout, but it's amazing what a bad eating day can do-- so I decided to continue as follows:

Walking lunges up the hill (40 total or 20 each leg) ......OMG, talk about a burn!
walk down
Repeat for a total of 3X

Cool down by running home.

I have to say, it was a great workout and it only took me 20 minutes. I even had time to go home, get my dog and walk her into town for coffee and bagels (for the kids, of course!). She is recovering from ACL surgery, so it's baby steps for her! NOT that she'd ever be able to run with me anyway (you can see in her photo--not a runner!), but we love our walks.

This type of workout is sooo much more efficient, as well as you burn way more fat, than the typical 30-45 minutes on a treadmill or whatever your machine of choice. So, get out and find a hill or someplace that will challenge you and push yourself! You don't have to run, but make sure you challenge yourself. Put an end to long, slow cardio for once and for all. It's only 20 minutes of your day......You just have to do it!

Please comment and let me know what you think.

For more interval type training workouts, check out ==> http://Tinyurl.com/offdl4

Have a great workout and an awesome day!

Rachel
http://www.losefatlivehealthy.com/